The JIF is a measure of the importance of an academic journal, reflecting the average number of citations of recent articles published in the journal. Therefore, journals with a higher JIF are deemed to be more important than those with a lower JIF. Authors publishing in journals with a high JIF have a competitive advantage. JIF calculation started in 1975 for those journals that were indexed in the Journal Citation Report (www.nd.edu/-pkarmat/citations/citations.html). Initially, most of the researchers considered the JIF an impartial and reliable validation. They even appreciated the simplification of a complex evaluation to a number that allowed a very simple and immediate comparison. For a short time, this was the single generally accepted solution, despite the complication in calculating the JIF. However the JIF’s dominance has been short. Some started to consider the matter in a different way and the criticism finally converged into a protest. The main proposed solutions are to continue with the JIF as it is, to revise and correct it, or to adopt other evaluation methods.

Impact factor or useless fight / Nicoletti, Marcello. - In: NATURAL PRODUCT RESEARCH. - ISSN 1478-6419. - STAMPA. - 29:10(2015), pp. 891-892. [10.1080/14786419.2015.1014196]

Impact factor or useless fight

NICOLETTI, Marcello
2015

Abstract

The JIF is a measure of the importance of an academic journal, reflecting the average number of citations of recent articles published in the journal. Therefore, journals with a higher JIF are deemed to be more important than those with a lower JIF. Authors publishing in journals with a high JIF have a competitive advantage. JIF calculation started in 1975 for those journals that were indexed in the Journal Citation Report (www.nd.edu/-pkarmat/citations/citations.html). Initially, most of the researchers considered the JIF an impartial and reliable validation. They even appreciated the simplification of a complex evaluation to a number that allowed a very simple and immediate comparison. For a short time, this was the single generally accepted solution, despite the complication in calculating the JIF. However the JIF’s dominance has been short. Some started to consider the matter in a different way and the criticism finally converged into a protest. The main proposed solutions are to continue with the JIF as it is, to revise and correct it, or to adopt other evaluation methods.
2015
impact factor relevance
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Impact factor or useless fight / Nicoletti, Marcello. - In: NATURAL PRODUCT RESEARCH. - ISSN 1478-6419. - STAMPA. - 29:10(2015), pp. 891-892. [10.1080/14786419.2015.1014196]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Nicoletti_Impact-factor_2015.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 424.83 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
424.83 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/884960
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact